Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JANUARY 2017

Uber-Meru COMPAT Order: A New Beginning For Aggregator Based Radio Taxi Services

PSA
Explore more from PSA

The Competition Commission of India ("CCI") has witnessed competition related issues pertaining to aggregator1 based radio taxi business across different states in India.

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Jaskaran Singh
Jaskaran Singh
Author LinkedIn connections

INTRODUCTION

The Competition Commission of India ("CCI") has witnessed competition related issues pertaining to aggregator1 based radio taxi business across different states in India. Most of the issues pertain to various anti-competitive practices vis-à-vis predatory pricing, unfair conditions etc. One such case that has gained limelight recently is "Meru Travels Solutions Private Limited v. Competition Commission of India & Ors"2, wherein Meru Travels Solutions Private Limited ("Informant" or "Meru") alleged that Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. along with its affiliate companies ("Uber") had engaged in an anti-competitive business model that was not in consonance with the Competition Act, 2002 ("Act").3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

An Update On India’s Proposed Digital Competition Law

India’s proposed Digital Competition Law has evolved through several stages, from the 2022 Parliamentary Committee report and the 2024 Committee on Digital Competition Law’s draft Bill, through a 2025 government reconsideration, to renewed Parliamentary backing for an ex-ante framework in August 2026. Drawing on comparative experience from the EU, UK, and Japan, this article argues that legislative reform must be matched by a strengthened Competition Commission of India if ex-ante regulation is to work in practice.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Article

Competition Law Updates August 2026

On 13 July 2026, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed penalties exceeding ₹142 crore on HP India and several reselers under Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) for cartelisation and bid rigging in the sale and supply of HP personal system products, including laptops, desktops, workstations and accessories (Computers Case), and ink and toner cartridges (Cartridges Case). The orders arose from lesser penalty applications filed by HP India under Section 46 of the Competition Act read with the CCI (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Keep The Key, Share The Gate: Competition Advocacy To States On Visa Application Services

Most visa applicants deal not with a consulate but with a single private provider they did not choose. Viewing visa facilitation through a competition lens, this article examines the concerns that exclusive contracts raise. While supporting outsourcing, it calls for advocacy with missions to open these services to more than one provider through better tender design.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Article

Resetting The Clock – Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (“Amendment Act”) received Presidential assent on April 6, 2026, marking the most significant reform to India’s insolvency framework since the original enactment of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code’s (“IBC”) in 2016 (and has yet to become law). Over the last decade, the IBC has transformed India’s insolvency landscape by improving creditor recoveries, shifting control from defaulting promoters to creditors and creating a modern regulatory framework where none existed before.
IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
PSA
PSA
Article

Retention Clauses Under Scrutiny: Enforcing Service Bonds In India

Indian courts are increasingly treating service bonds as legitimate commercial tools rather than automatic restraints on employment. When an employee leaves prematurely after receiving training or specialized benefits, can employers enforce bonds requiring compensation? This analysis examines the evolving judicial framework that determines when service bonds are valid, what evidence employers must provide, and how courts calculate recoverable damages when bonds are breached.
IndiaEmployment and HR
PSA
PSA
Article

Intermediaries: A New Playbook Beyond Passive Compliance

Intermediary liability in India is governed by section 79 of the Information Technology Act (“IT Act”).This section provides safe harbour protection to intermediaries for third-party information, subject to compliance with due diligence obligations under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (“IT Intermediary Rules”), particularly Part II, which governs intermediary conduct. On March 30, 2026, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (“MeitY”) released draft amendments for public consultation.
IndiaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
PSA
PSA
Article

Confidentiality: Enforceability Of Post-Employment Obligations

Indian courts have consistently upheld confidentiality obligations while striking down post-employment non-compete clauses, but the enforceability of these protections depends on precise contractual drafting and demonstrable evidence of misuse. This analysis examines landmark cases that define the boundaries between protectable trade secrets and an employee's general skills, revealing what businesses must establish to secure legal protection when confidential information is compromised.
IndiaEmployment and HR
PSA
PSA