Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2025

Prior CCI Approval Mandatory For Resolution Plans Involving Combinations: Supreme Court

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

In a recent decision , the Supreme Court of India (Court), interpreted the proviso to Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and held that, where a resolution plan provides for a combination under the Competition Act, 2002.

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law

Introduction

In a recent decision1, the Supreme Court of India (Court), interpreted the proviso to Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and held that, where a resolution plan provides for a combination under the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act), prior approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is mandatory, before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) considers the plan.

Facts

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against Hindustan National Glass and Industries Ltd. (HNGIL/Corporate Debtor) before the National Law Company Tribunal, Kolkata (NCLT). HNGIL has a 60% market share of the glass packaging industry in India. Resolution plans were submitted by AGI Greenpac Ltd. (AGI) and Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. (INSCO). AGI is the second largest company in the same filed as HNGIL.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from