On October 10, 2019, the Delhi High Court
('DHC') ruled that the CCI is not bound by
the Director General's ('DG') report
and that the Act does not bind CCI to accept the DG's
recommendations.1
SRMB Srijan Ltd. ('SRMB') entered into
a Gas Sale Purchase Agreement ('GSPA')
with Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd.
('GEECL'). The petitioner, i.e., Saurabh
Tripathy (an employee of SRMB) filed information before the CCI on
September 16, 2019 alleging abuse of dominant position by GEECL for
imposing unfair and discriminatory conditions for supply of Coalbed
Methane Gas ('CBM'). After forming a prima
facie opinion that GEECL is dominant in the relevant market and
that the terms of the GSPA appeared to be in favor of the GEECL and
against SRMB, the CCI directed the DG by way of order dated
December 29, 2014 to conduct a detailed investigation into the
matter. The DG, in its investigation report, concluded that there
was in fact abuse of dominance since the clauses in the