Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2026

Competition Law Newsletter – March 2026

DSK Legal
Explore more from DSK Legal

A decade old saga continues with the case originating from a 2015 complaint by the All India Online Vendors Association...

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Abdullah Hussain
Abdullah Hussain
Kanika Chaudhary Nayar
Kanika Chaudhary Nayar
Abhishek Singh Baghel
Abhishek Singh Baghel
Author LinkedIn connections

In this edition of the Competition Law Newsletter, we bring to you a significant decision of the Supreme Court and key orders passed by the Competition Commission of India in the month of February 2026.

SUPREME COURT QUASHES NCLAT'S 2020 PROBE ORDER AGAINST FLIPKART; CASE SENT BACK FOR RECONSIDERATION

A decade old saga continues with the case originating from a 2015 complaint by the All India Online Vendors Association (AIOVA) against Flipkart India Private Limited, alleging abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act, through anti-competitive practices like deep discounting, predatory pricing, and preferential treatment of select sellers.

The CCI initially closed the case on November 6, 2018, finding insufficient evidence of dominance or abuse. However, in a significant ruling on March 4, 2020, the NCLAT set aside the CCI's closure order and directed the CCI's Director General to investigate. The NCLAT's reasoning was twofold – first, it

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

An Update On India’s Proposed Digital Competition Law

India’s proposed Digital Competition Law has evolved through several stages, from the 2022 Parliamentary Committee report and the 2024 Committee on Digital Competition Law’s draft Bill, through a 2025 government reconsideration, to renewed Parliamentary backing for an ex-ante framework in August 2026. Drawing on comparative experience from the EU, UK, and Japan, this article argues that legislative reform must be matched by a strengthened Competition Commission of India if ex-ante regulation is to work in practice.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Corporate Professionals - Advisors & Advocates
Article

Competition Law Updates August 2026

On 13 July 2026, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed penalties exceeding ₹142 crore on HP India and several reselers under Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) for cartelisation and bid rigging in the sale and supply of HP personal system products, including laptops, desktops, workstations and accessories (Computers Case), and ink and toner cartridges (Cartridges Case). The orders arose from lesser penalty applications filed by HP India under Section 46 of the Competition Act read with the CCI (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Adjudication Or Legislation? Google's Play Store Battle Before The CCI And The Future Of Digital Competition Law In India

As the world evolves, every economy is now making progress towards becoming a technology-driven economy and there is an ongoing debate to bring specific changes to the competition law for a technology-driven economy. The prevailing view, however, is that the existing Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) already reaches several technology-based claims, and major jurisdictions have stretched their competition statutes to cover platform conduct rather than wait for bespoke digital-market legislation.
IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners