Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2018

Competition Law Flash - April 2018

Though this is only the second verdict emanating from the said Leniency Regulations, it bears testimony to the fact that the Regulations and CCI's approach in their interpretation is a step...

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
  1. Second verdict by CCI under the Leniency Regulations

On April 19, 2018, CCI entertained an application for leniency filed by Panasonic Energy India Company Ltd. ("Panasonic", part of Panasonic Corporation, Japan) in a matter where Panasonic plead for lesser penalty whilst disclosing that it was operating a cartel along with Eveready Industries India Ltd. ("Eveready") and Indo National Limited ("Nippo") concerning manipulation and/or distortion of production, price, sale, supply and distribution of zinc-carbon dry batteries sold by them, which was a mutually beneficial arrangement for the entities. It is pertinent to note that even the managerial personnel of the aforesaid entities were directly instrumental in achieving cartelisation. It is also noteworthy that the Association of Indian Dry Cell Manufacturers ("AIDCM") was an active participant to the cartel and its activities. Accordingly, penalties were also imposed on the said personnel and the AIDCM. CCI

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from