Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2015

Competition Commission's Rulings On Competition & Antritrust Laws

CCI maintaining distance from the jurisdiction of electricity sector regulators State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) denied to examine fixation of electricity tariffs under the provisions of S. 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law

Competition Commission of India denied to scan fixation of Electricity Tariffs and open access charges, case against Discoms closed CCI : CCI maintaining distance from the jurisdiction of electricity sector regulators State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) denied to examine fixation of electricity tariffs under the provisions of S. 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. [In re: Open Access Users Association and Tata Power Delhi Distribution, CCI 146; decided on 29.09.2015]

Antitrust case against Shikshantar School, Gurgaon is closed prima facie Competition Commission of India: CCI, not finding prima facie violation of S. 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, closed a case against Shikshantar School for alleged anti-competitive activities. The informant parents had alleged that after withdrawal of admission of their child the school was not refunding the fee paid by them for child's education. [In re: Baby Nandini Garg and Management of Shikshantar School, CCI 144;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from