Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 NOVEMBER 2017

Competition Commission's Perspective On Lifting The Corporate Veil When Determining Bids From Sister Concerns

Accordingly, the Director General was directed to investigate the matter.

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law

1.         INTRODUCTION

In a recent order1 dated October 5, 2017 (the "Order"), the Competition Commission of India (the  "CCI") found Grasim Industries Limited ("GIL"), Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Limited ("ABCIL")  and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited ("GACL") in contravention of Section 3(1) read with  Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act') for rigging Delhi Jal Board ("DJB")  tenders, which were floated for the public procurement of Poly Aluminium Chloride  ("PAC") used in  the purification of water.

2.         BACKGROUND

Following  the information  filed by the DJB, alleging GIL, ABCIL, GACL and Kanoria Chemicals and  Industries Limited ("KCIL") (collectively, the "Opposite  Parties")  of collusively tendering and  price cartelisation over a series of annual tenders for the public procurement of PAC, the CCI had,  in its prima facie opinion, found the Opposite Parties to be in contravention of the provisions of  Section 3 (

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from