Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2026

Singapore Court Upholds Intra-EU ECT Arbitration Award, Dismisses Objections Based On Komstroy

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Contributor
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

We are a leading Swiss business law firm with offices in Zurich, Geneva and Singapore. We take care...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

On 9 January 2026, the Singapore International Commercial Court issued its judgment upholding a £183 million Energy Charter Treaty ("ECT") award against Poland...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 9 January 2026, the Singapore International Commercial Court issued its judgment upholding a £183 million Energy Charter Treaty ("ECT") award against Poland – in which it dealt with, for the first time, the controversial question of the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals over intra-EU investment disputes (i.e. disputes between EU investors and EU member states).

The setting aside application brought by Poland before the Singapore court arose from an underlying ECT arbitration commenced by UK investors against Poland over a certain coal project. Key arguments made by Poland to justify setting aside the award centred around, among others, its claim that the arbitral tribunal had no jurisdiction over the dispute following the CJEU's decision in Republic of Moldova v Komstroy ("Komstroy"), which held that the arbitration provisions of the ECT did not apply to intra-EU investment disputes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from