Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2025

Annulment And Vacatur: Challenging ICSID And Non-ICSID Awards

AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Contributor
AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners, one of India’s premier law firms was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to...

View firm profile
Explore more from AZB & Partners

Finality of an award is not just a desired but an essential feature of international arbitration; however, such finality must be balanced with the need to ensure the sanctity and integrity of the arbitral process.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This article was first published by Global Arbitration Review in October 2025 and can be accessed at GAR Guide to Investment Treaty Protection and Enforcement Third Edition

Introduction

Finality of an award is not just a desired but an essential feature of international arbitration; however, such finality must be balanced with the need to ensure the sanctity and integrity of the arbitral process.1 Accordingly, as considered in this chapter, both International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and non-ICSID treaty awards are subjected to limited grounds for challenge within fixed limits.2

The scope of the grounds for challenging an investment treaty award depends on whether the arbitration is governed by the ICSID Convention.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from