Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2026

USTR Proposes New Section 301 Tariffs For Forced Labor Enforcement

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

The U.S. Trade Representative has determined that 60 trading partners maintain practices actionable under Section 301, proposing sweeping ad valorem tariffs of 10-12.5% on imports from these economies due to inadequate forced labor import restrictions.

GlobalInternational Law
Heusel Mark
Heusel Mark
Jacob Clark
Jacob Clark
Hezi Wang
Hezi Wang
Author LinkedIn connections

On March 12, 2026, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) initiated 60 investigations under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 to assess whether the acts, policies, and practices of certain trading partners relating to forced labor import restrictions are unreasonable or discriminatory, and whether they burden or restrict U.S. commerce.

On June 2, 2026, the USTR announced significant findings and proposed trade actions following these investigations. Specifically, the USTR determined that all 60 investigated economies maintain practices that are actionable under Section 301.

USTR found that 54 countries have failed both to impose and effectively enforce a forced labor import ban. This group includes major trading partners, among others, such as:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

The Lindsey Graham Sanctions Act: What Businesses Need To Know About The New Tariffs

President Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act into law on September 18, 2026, establishing mandatory tariffs of up to 500% on Russian goods and up to 100% on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian energy. The Act targets major importers like China, India, and Turkey, with limited relief mechanisms including natural gas exceptions, presidential waivers, and a 270-day winddown period for entities divesting from Russian operations.
GlobalInternational Law
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

New Tariffs And Import Bans: An Update On The U.S.-Canada “Trade War”

The U.S.-Canada trading relationship has reached a critical juncture as both nations implement escalating trade measures, with Canada's counter-tariffs taking effect and the United States responding with unprecedented import bans on Canadian alcoholic beverages, dairy products, and motorcycles. These actions mark a significant expansion of the Trump Administration's use of Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, moving beyond additional tariffs to outright import restrictions. What does this escalation mean
GlobalInternational Law
Cassidy Levy Kent LLP
Cassidy Levy Kent LLP
Article

Updates On Export Controls Impacting AI & Advanced Computing

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security issued guidance on May 31, 2026, clarifying licensing requirements for advanced computing items and AI technologies. The guidance maintains export restrictions for entities in certain countries while providing limited relief for data center operators, though questions remain about future regulatory direction. Companies must now strengthen their compliance programs and supply-chain due diligence as BIS continues to prioritize national security
GlobalInternational Law
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Article

Update On CAPE Phase 3 Duty Refunds From U.S. Customs And Border Protection

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced that importers with court orders for IEEPA duty refunds on finally liquidated entries can begin filing for those refunds starting October 6, 2026, through the CAPE Phase 3 system. This development follows the Supreme Court's February 2026 decision striking down IEEPA tariffs and represents a critical step for importers seeking refunds on entries liquidated for more than 80 days.
United StatesInternational Law
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Article

Congress Passes New Russian Sanctions Bill Providing Additional Tariff Authority To Address Countries That Purchase Russian Energy, Facilitate Evasion Of Russian Sanctions

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed H.R. 5334, the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, which directs the President to impose tariffs of up to 500 percent on Russian imports and up to 100 percent on imports from countries that are significant purchasers of Russian energy. The bill includes provisions for Presidential waiver authority and a five-year sunset clause...
GlobalInternational Law
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Article

IEEPA Tariff Refunds: Critical Developments, Phase III Delays, And Action Steps For Importers

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has begun processing IEEPA tariff refunds through its CAPE system, but Phase III covering finally liquidated entries faces delays and requires court orders. With the Department of Justice appealing the universal refund order and class certification pending, importers with finally liquidated entries may need to file individual lawsuits at the Court of International Trade to preserve their claims before statutory deadlines expire.
United StatesInternational Law
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Article

The FCC Reaches Deeper Into The Grid – And The Warehouse

The Federal Communications Commission has added foreign-produced power inverters and advanced robotic devices to its Covered List under national security determinations, immediately barring new equipment authorizations and creating compliance deadlines for manufacturers. Companies must now evaluate whether their products qualify as domestic end products under Federal Acquisition Regulation standards or pursue conditional approval pathways by January 1, 2028.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Article

The State Of AI Regulation In Healthcare: Still Complicated

As artificial intelligence tools become embedded in clinical care, diagnostics, and health insurance operations, healthcare organizations must navigate an evolving patchwork of federal oversight and state-specific AI regulations. With 21 states having enacted 33 healthcare-AI laws by the end of 2025 and 177 pending bills across 31 states in 2026, the regulatory landscape remains fragmented while federal agencies work to establish comprehensive standards. Understanding these overlapping requirements is criti
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Article

Nashville Catering Alcohol Rules: Beer And Liquor

Catering liquor and beer license holders in Nashville must navigate two distinct regulatory frameworks: Metro Nashville's distance restrictions for beer catering permits and Tennessee state limitations on catering liquor licenses. Understanding these rules is essential to avoid compliance issues and ensure events proceed smoothly, particularly when venues are near schools, places of worship, or Metro parks.
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Article

U.S. District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan Enters Judgment In Favor Of Ascion, LLC

After nearly five years of contentious international arbitration, a Michigan-based manufacturer of adjustable bed bases and mattresses secured a substantial monetary judgment against its Taiwan-based supplier and the supplier's parent company. The case involved complex evidence, intricate legal issues, and Mandarin translation of documents and testimony, ultimately resulting in the confirmation of multiple arbitration awards by a federal district court.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC