Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2026

BIS Enforcement Action Highlights Export Control Risks For Software Updates And Entity List Transactions

A U.S. software company's $2 million settlement with BIS reveals critical compliance gaps in export controls for software transactions. The case demonstrates how automatic software updates, maintenance services, and sales through distributors can create ongoing export violations when customers are added to restricted-party lists, even for commercially available EAR99 software.

GlobalInternational Law

Key Takeaways

  • EAR99 does not mean uncontrolled. Companies cannot assume that commercially available or EAR99 software can be provided to any customer without a license.
  • Restricted-party screening should continue throughout the customer relationship. Violations arose when software updates continued to be made available to an existing customer after the customer was added to the Entity List.
  • Sales through a distributor do not protect against violations. Violations involved transactions conducted through distributors in Japan and China where transaction documents identified the ultimate customer.
  • Informal attempts to understand export restrictions are not a substitute for an export compliance program. Penalties were aggravated based on the company’s lack of written export compliance procedures, trained personnel, designated compliance responsibility, and timely legal guidance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from