Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2026

Global Enforcement Architecture: How To Coordinate Regional Anti-counterfeiting Actions For Maximum Impact

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Brand enforcement efforts are scaling up with increased takedowns, border seizures, and platform cooperation, yet counterfeiting networks persist by quickly reconstituting under new identities. The fundamental challenge lies not in the availability of enforcement tools, but in the absence of a cohesive strategic framework to dismantle these resilient supply chains permanently.

GlobalIntellectual Property

Strategic framing: why orchestration matters

Brand enforcement has become more active and less effective at the same time. Takedown volumes have grown, border seizures have multiplied and platform cooperation has improved – yet the same counterfeiting networks resurface, the same sellers reappear under new identities and the same supply chains reconstitute within weeks. The problem is not a lack of tools. It is a lack of architecture.

Most global programmes are organised along regional lines – a US team manages platforms and litigation, a European team handles customs and injunctions, and an Asian team coordinates administrative raids. Each operates with genuine sophistication. However, because these efforts are rarely sequenced or governed as a system, the aggregate impact falls short of what the combined toolset should produce. Intelligence generated by US platform investigations is not routinely translated into EU customs targeting. European seizure data is not systematically fed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

See more popular content from