Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

CCI Penalties On Global Turnover – Relevant And Proportionate?

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Contributor
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Founded on a century of legal achievements, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) was born...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) empowers the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to levy a penalty on enterprises involved in any anti-competitive agreement...

GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law

Views expressed here are personal.

INTRODUCTION

Section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) empowers the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to levy a penalty on enterprises involved in any anti-competitive agreement or found to be abusing their dominant position. The CCI can penalize an offending enterprise up to 10% of its average turnover for the last three years.1

During its first eight years, the CCI levied penalties based on the total turnover of an enterprise. The term total turnover related to all the goods sold or services provided by the enterprise in question, and not just the goods or services which were the subject matter of the breach of the Competition Act. This resulted in harsh and disproportionate2 penalties between single and multi-product enterprises for the same offence. Separately, these penalties ranged from 1% to 10% of turnover and there was no discernible trend linking the penalty to the severity of the offence

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from