Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2026

UPC Orders Infringer To Publish Decision On Their Website

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

A landmark ruling from the Düsseldorf Local Division demonstrates the Unified Patent Court's willingness to compel defendants to publicly correct misleading statements about patent disputes on their own platforms.

GermanyIntellectual Property

A recent decision handed down by the Düsseldorf Local Division in UPC_CFI_351/2024 underscores the Unified Patent Court's authority to mandate transparency when a defendant’s public statements distort the reality of a legal dispute. Under Article 80 UPCA, the Court may order appropriate measures to disseminate information regarding its decision at the expense of the infringer. In this specific case, the Defendants had utilized their own corporate website to create a public impression that their products were non-infringing, explicitly stating their confidence in the legality of their distribution activities.

The Court determined that such actions created a false impression in the public domain that required direct rectification. Consequently, the Court not only allowed the Claimant to publish the decision across five industry journals but also took the more significant step of ordering the Defendants to publish the operative part of the Court’s judgment directly on their own websites

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from