Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2026

Providing An Interactive Seat Map By Building An Overlay: Technical

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

A European Patent Office Board of Appeal decision examines whether implementing an interactive seat map using raster graphics with HTML coded image maps instead of vector graphics like Adobe Flash constitutes a technical contribution sufficient for patent eligibility. The case explores the boundary between technical implementation choices and mere presentation of information in web-based applications.

GermanyIntellectual Property

The application underlying the discussed decision concerns a method for providing an interactive seat map showing the locations of available tickets in an event venue, built at a client computer using a base map, a coded image map, and ticket inventory data received from a network-based system. The decisive feature was the implementation of the interactive seat map by building an overlay on top of a raster graphics base map using an HTML coded image map, as opposed to using vector graphics technologies like Adobe Flash. The Board of Appeal considered this implementation choice to involve technical considerations, leading to remittal of the case for further search and prosecution.

Here are the practical takeaways from the decision: T 0133/21 (Interactive seat map/STUBHUB) of 2 July 2024, of the Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.01.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from