Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2024

LD Munich, November 21, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_550/2024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

According to Rule 172.2 RoP, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings order a party alleging a fact to produce evidence within its control.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

The Rules of Procedure of the UPC do not contain a principle according to which evidence for factual allegations arising from the action may no longer be submitted by the party to the action after the action has been filed.

According to Rule 172.2 RoP, the Court may at any stage of the proceedings order a party alleging a fact to produce evidence within its control.

The parties are required to present their arguments in full as early as possible in the proceedings (item 7 of the preamble to the RoP). However, the RoP do not contain any principle according to which evidence for factual allegations of the party bringing the action may no longer be submitted after the action has been filed; otherwise there would be no basis for R. 103.1 (c), 104 (e), 172.2 and 114 RoP.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from