Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2024

LD Munich, December 12, 2024, Order On Provisional Measures, UPC_CFI_201/2024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

Neither the English nor the German nor the French version state that the fee "has been received by the court". The wording in all languages clearly state that it is sufficient that the court fees.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

It follows from R. 15(2) RoP that it is sufficient that the court fees have been paid for the statement of claim to be deemed to have been lodged.

Neither the English nor the German nor the French version state that the fee "has been received by the court". The wording in all languages clearly state that it is sufficient that the court fees have been paid for the statement of claim to be deemed to have been lodged (per se and not when: R. 15 (2) RoP does not stipulate the date of filing).

The wording of R. 213(1) RoP unambiguously states that the "start" of the proceedings on the merits is sufficient.

Rule 213 (1) RoP states that applicant has to "start" proceedings on the merits. The wording of the rule unambiguously states that the "start" of the proceedings on the merits is sufficient. Starting something in other words means to begin with. Starting the proceedings on the merits means that the statement of claim is filed in the CMS and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from