Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2024

LD Duesseldorf, September 2, 2024, Request To Allocate Another Technically Qualified Judge, UPC_CFI_368/2024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

Defendant's application for a review of the allocation of a technically qualified judge in order to allocate another technically qualified judge with experience...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

No opportunity for parties to make suggestions on (technical) background of one of the judges allocated to the panel

Defendant's application for a review of the allocation of a technically qualified judge in order to allocate another technically qualified judge with experience in the field of mechanical engineering is dismissed.

The technically qualified judge is one of the judges of the panel as defined in Articles 19 and 20 UPCA (concerning the Court of First Instance) and the legal texts governing the UPC do not provide the opportunity for the parties to "make suggestion regarding (...) the technical or other relevant background" of one of the judges allocated to the panel, unlike in the case of the appointment of a court expert (R 185.2 RoP). The only ground on which a party may object to a judge taking part in the proceedings is provided for by the provisions of the Article 7.4 UPCA relating to partiality.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from