Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2024

CD Munich, 24 January 2024, Procedural Order And Information On Next Steps, UPC_CFI_1/2023

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The UPC proceedings are generally front-loaded (e.g., Preamble RoP 7). Therefore, the exchange of written pleadings is normally limited in accordance with Rule 43 RoP.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

There is no automatic right to reply to a rejoinder

The UPC proceedings are generally front-loaded (e.g., Preamble RoP 7). Therefore, the exchange of written pleadings is normally limited in accordance with Rule 43 RoP.

A request for the admission of a brief in response to a rejoinder in the written procedure is not premature

It does not follow from the fact that the judge-rapporteur may order the production of further pleadings and evidence in the interim procedure, that a request aiming at this, which was made before closure of the written procedure, is as such premature and should for that reason be rejected.

2. Division

Munich Central Division

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from