Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2024

CD Paris, July 2, 2024, Order On CMS Workflows In Revocation Action, UPC_CFI_484/2023

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

If there is a separate workflow for the Application to amend the patent, the party should use this workflow instead of filing the Application...

FranceIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Whenever certain workflows are provided, parties shall use the correct workflows for lodging documents.

If there is a separate workflow for the Application to amend the patent, the party should use this workflow instead of filing the Application in the same submission as the Statement of Defense. This makes the CMS more transparent and more accessible and is in line with the provisions in Rule 4.1 RoP.

Using the wrong workflow may render a submission inadmissible in the future.

Only "for now" the use of the wrong workflow does not render a submission inadmissible.

The RoP must be interpreted with reference to the principles of fairness and proportionality (Preamble No. 2 RoP).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from