Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2016

A Null And Void Non-Compete Clause Does Not Trigger Automatic Damages

Until now, there has been no requirement for an employee to demonstrate any loss suffered to be entitled to damages owing to a null and void non-compete clause inserted into his or her employment contract.

FranceEmployment and HR

Until now, there has been no requirement for an employee to demonstrate any loss suffered to be entitled to damages owing to a null and void non-compete clause inserted into his or her employment contract.

In its decision of 25 May 2016 (Cass.soc. 25 May 2016, n°14-20.578), the French Supreme Court reversed this approach. Henceforth, an employee will have to prove the loss suffered in order to claim damages.

In the present case, an employee of a professional investment company terminated his employment contract, alleging breaches of the contract by his employer immediately after he had received a notice summoning him to a pre-dismissal meeting.

Despite the non-compete clause in his employment contract, he set up a company with one of his colleagues to compete against his former employer. At the same time, the former employee lodged a file before the Employment Tribunal, making a number of claims against his former employer relating to the performance

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from