Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2016

Standing Out From The Crowd – Corn Thins, Neologisms And Distinctiveness

The Board of Appeal dismissed further arguments that were put forward in support of the Corn Thins trade mark registration.

European UnionIntellectual Property

A recent European Union ("EU") trade mark decision on the registrability of the trade mark Corn Thins is interesting not only because it deals with newly coined expressions and the issue of distinctiveness, but it also shows how a bit of common sense can go a long way.

The crisp issues (pun intended) in the case in question were whether the trade mark Corn Thins was distinctive for goods that were essentially crispbread slices made of corn, and whether an EU trade mark registration was valid.

The lower tribunal (the Cancellation Division) held that the trade mark Corn Thins was distinctive, and thus a valid registration. It adopted a somewhat literal and pedantic approach and said that the term Corn Thins was a neologism; that is, "a new word or expression". It justified this finding by saying that the word "thins" is not a noun but a new and playful way to name a product from a specific producer and is registrable as a trade mark.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from