Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2025

Flaws Of Article 368 In Egypt's Draft Criminal Law

Andersen
Andersen
Contributor
Explore more from Andersen

In a legislative move that shakes the foundations of fair trial principles, Article 368 of Egypt's Draft Criminal Procedure Law imposes harsh restrictions on absent defendants upon the issuance of a mere in-absentia conviction in a felony...

EgyptCriminal Law

In a legislative move that shakes the foundations of fair trial principles, Article 368 of Egypt's Draft Criminal Procedure Law imposes harsh restrictions on absent defendants upon the issuance of a mere in-absentia conviction in a felony, without awaiting a final, binding judgment, and without distinguishing the nature or severity of the crime. This provision does not stop at barring the defendant from managing or disposing of their assets; it goes further by completely stripping them of their legal capacity to file lawsuits, thereby opening the door to serious constitutional and legal violations.

Presumption of Innocence... A Hollow Principle?

Article 368 effectively nullifies the principle of presumption of innocence, treating the absent defendant as if definitively convicted. Instead of recognizing that an in-absentia conviction in felony cases is automatically nullified upon the defendant's appearance or arrest, the law rushes to cripple their civil rights and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from