Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2021

Fendi v Shanghai Yi Lang International Co

For many years, the China Trademark Office (CTMO) has not accepted "retail" services in Class 35, on the basis that the protection of services implies providing a service for others...

ChinaIntellectual Property

For many years, the China Trademark Office (CTMO) has not accepted "retail" services in Class 35, on the basis that the protection of services implies providing a service for others, rather than the sale of a brand owner's own goods.

In recent years, there has been a degree of relaxation of this practice – especially when retail services in Class 35 are filed through the International System or when such services relate to medical, pharmaceutical or veterinary products.

The Chinese courts are recognising that the exclusion of retail services from trade mark registration is commercially difficult and some decisions are determining confusion, although the position remains unpredictable. In Shenzhen Milan Station Trading Co v Milan Station (Hong Kong) Holdings Limited: the court held that "retail services" fell within the scope of "sales promotions (for others)", and similar reasoning was used to determine that retail supermarket services were similar to "sales

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from