Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2026

When Corporate Boundaries Blur: Lessons From R v. Binance Holdings Limited

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

The decision in R v. Binance Holdings Limited illustrates the complexities associated with prosecuting disputes involving crypto assets. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered its jurisdiction...

CanadaTechnology

Overview

The decision in R v. Binance Holdings Limited illustrates the complexities associated with prosecuting disputes involving crypto assets.1 The Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered its jurisdiction in a matter involving assets with no clear physical footprint owned by a constellation of related entities, including two foreign corporations.

While the case arose from a relatively small online fraud, it has major implications for multinational crypto exchanges and foreign digital asset platforms that serve Canadians.

The Underlying Fraud and Jurisdictional Dispute

Binance involves the prosecution of a fraud in which a Canadian resident was induced to transfer $65,000 of bitcoin to the perpetrators' cryptocurrency wallets. The wallets were connected to Binance's cryptocurrency exchange.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from