Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2016

Viewpoint: Preserving Privilege Over Communications In The Aftermath Of A Data Breach

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

While there are no guarantees as to which communications will ultimately be protected by privilege, a company can increase its odds of creating a sphere of privilege-protected communications...

CanadaTechnology

While there are no guarantees as to which communications will ultimately be protected by privilege, a company can increase its odds of creating a sphere of privilege-protected communications in the aftermath of a data breach by giving consideration to such issues in structuring its internal investigations.

Below we highlight lessons learned from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota following the much publicized December 2013 data breach involving Target Corporation (Target).

BACKGROUND

Following its data breach, Target initiated a two-track investigation.

On one track, Target set up an ordinary course internal investigation aimed at determining how the breach occurred and how Target and the credit card brands could respond to it. A team from Verizon Business Network Services (Verizon) was retained to assist with this investigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from