Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2025

Verify And Disclose AI Use – Requirements From The Federal Court

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

As lawyers increasingly use AI in their practice, we see more cases where courts deal with legal submissions involving AI hallucinations. This case deals with the issue of AI hallucinations and the failure...

CanadaTechnology

As lawyers increasingly use AI in their practice, we see more cases where courts deal with legal submissions involving AI hallucinations. This case deals with the issue of AI hallucinations and the failure to advise the court of the use of AI.

In Wael Mostafa Aly Hussein et al. v. The Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship (2025 FC 1060), the Federal Court of Canada scrutinized the undeclared use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in legal submissions made by Applicants' counsel in a motion to admit new evidence and request for an extension of time to file the Applicant Record.

After the Court could not locate a few authorities referenced in the Applicants' materials, it issued several Directions requiring a Book of Authorities. It was only after the last Direction was issued that Applicants' counsel advised of his reliance on Visto.ai, an AI legal research tool designed specifically for Canadian immigration and refugee law practitioners.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from