Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2022

Cryptocurrency Litigation: Traditional Remedies In Modern Circumstances

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Previously under seal and only recently released to the public, the Ontario Superior Court's decision in Cicada 137 LLC v Medjedovic, 2021 ONSC 8581 [Cicada] shows a necessarily functional approach for those seeking to identify, trace and freeze digital assets.

CanadaTechnology

Ontario Superior Court Issues an Anton Piller Order in Connection with Alleged Cryptocurrency Theft

Previously under seal and only recently released to the public, the Ontario Superior Court's decision in Cicada 137 LLC v Medjedovic, 2021 ONSC 8581 [Cicada] shows a necessarily functional approach for those seeking to identify, trace and freeze digital assets.

In the decision, Justice Myers granted an Anton Piller Order-a court remedy that allows the plaintiff, through a court-approved independent supervising lawyer, to enter a defendant's property in order to seize relevant devices and records-in connection with the alleged theft of $15 million in cryptocurrency tokens. In doing so, the court further demonstrated that remedies ordinarily available to potential targets of economic crime remain available in novel cases involving digital assets. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from