Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2005

The Canadian Problem With Limited Liability Companies – A Self-Help Approach

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The administrative position of Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with respect to U.S. limited liability companies (LLCs) has created considerable consternation. CRA consistently repeated its position that LLCs that are treated as fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes will not be entitled to the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention (the Convention) on the basis that they do not qualify as residents of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention even where all the members are U.S. residents.

CanadaTax

Article by Kenneth Snider, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Cross-Border Taxation - March 2005

The administrative position of Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with respect to U.S. limited liability companies (LLCs) has created considerable consternation. CRA consistently repeated its position that LLCs that are treated as fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes will not be entitled to the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention (the Convention) on the basis that they do not qualify as residents of the U.S. for purposes of the Convention even where all the members are U.S. residents. This position is in contrast to CRA’s "favourable" administrative position with respect to extending benefits to S corporations and generally looking through partnerships to the residency of the partners for purposes of applying a tax convention.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from