Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2009

FMC Team Prevails In "Beneficial Owner" Case

On Thursday, February 26, 2009, the Federal Court of Appeal reaffirmed the importance of "certainty and stability" in the interpretation of bilateral income tax treaties with the release of its decision in The Queen v. Prévost Car, Inc. The Federal Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the lower court's decision that a Dutch holding company was the "beneficial owner" of dividends received from its Canadian subsidiary for purposes of the tax treaty between Canada and the Netherlands.

CanadaTax

On Thursday, February 26, 2009, the Federal Court of Appeal reaffirmed the importance of "certainty and stability" in the interpretation of bilateral income tax treaties with the release of its decision in The Queen v. Prévost Car, Inc. The Federal Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the lower court's decision that a Dutch holding company was the "beneficial owner" of dividends received from its Canadian subsidiary for purposes of the tax treaty between Canada and the Netherlands. Please click here for prior coverage of the lower court's decision. In so doing, the Court refused to adopt the ambiguous and flexible meaning of "beneficial owner" put forward by the Canada Revenue Agency.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from