Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2018

Crane Swing Easements Are Definitely A Nuisance

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Until recently, neighbours to a new development had a great deal of leverage when it came to the use of their airspace for crane swings.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Until recently, neighbours to a new development had a great deal of leverage when it came to the use of their airspace for crane swings. Until the case of Janda Group Holdings Inc. v. Concost Management Inc., 2016 BCSC 1503 (“Janda”), it was unclear whether a crane entering a neighbour’s airspace during construction constitutes a trespass, which can be blocked by injunction, or a nuisance, which is properly compensable through damages.  Due to this uncertainty, neighbours were negotiating large payments to avoid an injunction against construction which could cause lengthy delays and cost overruns.

In Janda, the plaintiff carried on the business of leasing, renting and managing multiple commercial units.  Janda sued for an injunction against its neighbour who was swinging its crane through Janda’s airspace as part of the construction process.  Janda argued that the crane was dangerous and there could be physical injuries for which Janda would be responsible –

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from