Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2017

Agricultural Law NetLetter - Saturday, October 7, 2017 - Issue 381

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a chambers Judge who concluded that the term in a lentil production contract that specified "#2 Canada" grade lentils was...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of a chambers Judge who concluded that the term in a lentil production contract that specified "#2 Canada" grade lentils was a "true condition precedent" and that two farmers who signed this contract, but were not able to produce this grade because of poor weather conditions, had no obligation to supply any lentils, including lower grade lentils instead of this grade. Market prices had risen sharply between the time the contract was entered and the lentils were to be supplied. The Court of Appeal rejected the purchaser's argument that it was entitled to waive the higher grade requirement, because this requirement was a true condition precedent in which the obligations of both sides to the contract were dependent on an uncertain future event that was not under the control of either party. (PS International Canada Corp. (c.o.b. Seaboard Specialty Grains and Foods) v. Palimar Farms Inc., CALN/2017-05

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from