Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2016

Establishing The Due Diligence Defence Under CASL

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Despite being in force for over two years, many of the key provisions of Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation ("CASL" or the "Act") remain shrouded in uncertainty.

CanadaPrivacy

Despite being in force for over two years, many of the key provisions of Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation ("CASL" or the "Act") remain shrouded in uncertainty.  One such provision, for example, is the Act's due diligence defence regime.  While a person cannot be found liable for a violation of the Act if they establish that they exercised due diligence in their anti-spam practices, the Act is silent on what must be undertaken in order to rely on this defence.  

Seeking Due Diligence Guidance

Although CASL itself offers no clarity, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC") has provided advice over the years for how organizations can exercise due diligence under other legislation regimes.  Such guidance may potentially be useful in the context of CASL.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from