Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2009

Appeal Court Finds No Defamation Liability For Hyperlinking

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Crookes v. Newton, the BC Court of Appeal recently considered whether hyperlinking to another website or article that contains defamatory material gives rise to liability for defamation.

CanadaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In Crookes v. Newton, the BC Court of Appeal recently considered whether hyperlinking to another website or article that contains defamatory material gives rise to liability for defamation.

To succeed in a defamation action, the defendant must have published (i.e., communicated) the actionable material to a third party. In TLQ 4:4, we reported that the BC Supreme Court ruled that merely hyperlinking to allegedly defamatory material on another website does not amount to "publication" and dismissed the action. The plaintiffs appealed that decision, and the BC Court of Appeal largely upheld the lower court ruling.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the mere creation of a hyperlink does not give rise to an automatic presumption of publication. However, the court went on to state that hyperlinking could constitute publication and give rise to liability for defamation in some circumstances (e.g., inviting or actively encouraging viewers to read the defamatory materials or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from