Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2016

Without Prejudice? Settlement Privilege Across The Border

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

Chris Caparelli is the author of "Without Prejudice? Settlement Privilege Across the Border," an article for the Advocates' Society Advocates' Journal.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Christopher Caparelli
Christopher Caparelli
Author LinkedIn connections

Chris Caparelli is the author of "Without Prejudice? Settlement Privilege Across the Border," an article for the Advocates' Society Advocates' Journal. In the article, Chris discusses the differences in approach that Canada and the United States take in public policies around settlement in legal disputes—substantial divergences that, as Chris indicates, "can lead to different litigation outcomes on either side of the border."

To download a PDF of the article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Can An Arbitration Agreement Preclude Appeals, Even With Errors Of Law?

An Ontario court ruled that arbitration agreements containing "final and binding" language may prevent parties from appealing legal errors made by arbitrators. The decision examines how a $3 million construction dispute was resolved through arbitration, and why the losing party could not challenge the arbitrator's legal mistakes despite their significant financial impact.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Article

Boeing and Securities Class Certification: Trends in the United States and Canada

A U.S. appeals court has unanimously overturned certification of a securities class action against Boeing, establishing that plaintiffs must demonstrate a workable, class-wide damages methodology at the certification stage. This decision reinforces heightened standards for class certification that parallel evolving requirements in Canadian securities litigation, where courts increasingly demand concrete evidence and specific liability theories before approving class actions.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Article

Lessons In Suing Securities Regulators: Herner v. Mutual Fund Dealers Association And Ontario Securities Commission, 2026 ONSC 4889

A mutual fund dealing representative sued the MFDA and OSC for $47.5 million in damages, alleging intentional torts including conspiracy, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution stemming from a regulatory investigation and enforcement proceedings. The 21-day trial resulted in complete dismissal of all claims, with the court making significant findings on regulatory immunity provisions and the scope of duties owed by securities regulators to regulated persons.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP
Crawley MacKewn Brush LLP
Article

Landmark SCC Ruling Provides Clarity On Privative Clauses

The Supreme Court of Canada has delivered a landmark ruling declaring section 66 of the Conflict of Interest Act unconstitutional, fundamentally reshaping the boundaries between legislative authority and judicial oversight of administrative decisions. This unanimous decision addresses longstanding questions about the validity of privative clauses that restrict courts' ability to review findings by Parliament's ethics commissioner.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Landmark SCC Ruling Provides Clarity On Privative Clauses

The Supreme Court of Canada has delivered a landmark ruling declaring section 66 of the Conflict of Interest Act unconstitutional, fundamentally reshaping the boundaries between legislative authority and judicial oversight of administrative decisions. This unanimous decision addresses longstanding questions about the validity of privative clauses that restrict courts' ability to review findings by Parliament's ethics commissioner.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Government Of Canada Makes Significant Changes To Energy Project Approvals Process

On September 3, the Government of Canada published amendments removing seven types of energy projects from the Physical Activities Regulations (the Project List) under the Impact Assessment Act (IAA). As a result, these types of projects will no longer be subject to the IAA but will continue to be regulated by the Canada Energy Regulator Act (CER Act) or applicable provincial environmental assessment regimes.
CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources
Torys
Torys
Article

US Federal Court Considers The Implications For Canadian Exempt Organizations Earning US Source Income Through An Intermediary Vehicle

The US Court of Federal Claims recently addressed a critical question for Canadian exempt organizations earning US-source income: can they rely on fiscal transparency rules to claim treaty benefits through investment vehicles? The court's ruling in The South Saskatchewan Community Foundation Inc. v. United States examines when charitable organizations may look through intermediary entities to access tax exemptions under the US-Canada tax treaty, with significant implications for cross-border investment
United StatesTax
Torys
Torys
Article

Keeping Your AI Disclosure Clean: “AI Washing” In The United States And Lessons For Canadian Issuers

In the first half of 2026, there have been more AI-related securities class action filings in the United States than in all of 2025, representing the highest number of such claims in the last five years1. Many of these class actions involve allegations of “AI washing”—a term used to describe issuers alleged to have exaggerated or misrepresented the role, capabilities, or impact of AI in their business.
WorldwideCorporate/Commercial Law
Torys
Torys
Article

Ontario Court Of Appeal Weighs In On The Bounds Of Solicitor-client Privilege

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled on the protection of lawyers' trust ledgers under solicitor-client privilege, addressing whether these financial records can be compelled in civil fraud proceedings. The decision examines the scope of the crime-fraud exception to privilege and whether it applies beyond criminal cases to civil matters involving allegations of fraudulent conduct and breach of court orders.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Torys
Torys
Article

Canada’s Merger Review Landscape: Longer Reviews, More Complexity, Increased Litigation, And Greater Deal Uncertainty

The amendments expanded the Competition Bureau’s ability to challenge mergers, and directed greater attention toward smaller and serial acquisitions. The practical result is an environment characterized by longer and more intensive merger reviews, increased scrutiny of transactions that fall below the notification thresholds, and greater willingness by the Bureau to litigate.
CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law
Torys
Torys
Article

Ontario Writes The Playbook: A New Framework For Data Centre Grid Connections

On August 13, Ontario released long-awaited details on how the province will regulate the connection of data centres to its electricity grid1. Titled the Data Centre Playbook (the Playbook), the proposed framework outlines how the province plans to evaluate large-scale data centres against the government’s objectives of driving economic growth, keeping Canadians’ data in Canada, and delivering benefits to local communities2.
CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources
Torys
Torys