Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2025

Supreme Court Clarifies Adverse Possession: Key Takeaways From Kosicki v. Toronto

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

On September 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28. The case directly addressed whether private...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On September 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28. The case directly addressed whether private landowners can succeed in adverse possession claims against municipal property that is not a highway or road allowance.

In this case, the subject lands were parkland, but this decision could have an impact on a variety of municipal properties. The ruling provides important clarity for property owners, municipalities, and developers alike.¹

The legal test for adverse possession

In Ontario, adverse possession—often called "squatters' rights"—is a common law right that is also governed by the Real Property Limitations Act (RPLA). The Court reaffirmed that a party seeking title through adverse possession must demonstrate three key elements, satisfied continuously for at least ten years before the property was brought into the Land Titles System:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from