Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2013

Summary Judgment Motion To Be Struck ‘Only In The Clearest Of Cases’

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

So said Justice Goldstein in "Stever v Rainbow International Carpet Dyeing & Cleaning Co", 2013 ONSC 241.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

So said Justice Goldstein in Stever v Rainbow International Carpet Dyeing & Cleaning Co, 2013 ONSC 241. The judge noted there that the Ontario Court of Appeal did not address the question of when to stay a summary judgment motion in Combined Air Mechanical v Flesch, 2011 ONCA 764. Guidance is to be found in Ghaffari v Abisyaban, [2012] OJ No 2402 (SCJ), and George Weston v Domtar Inc, 2012 ONSC 5001, which endorse the proposition that a motion to strike a summary judgment should be granted 'only in the clearest of cases' – a phrase with a long judicial history. Litigants are advised, therefore, 'to take a very hard look at the merits of the proposed motion to strike by setting the bar high', with the prospect of costs sanctions as a further deterrent to being too quick to seek to strike.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from