Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2022

Richmond Hill Councillor's Lawsuit Is SLAPPed

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

An action that arises out of an expression on a matter of public interest is vulnerable to a motion for dismissal under section 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act (the "CJA").

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An action that arises out of an expression on a matter of public interest is vulnerable to a motion for dismissal under section 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act (the "CJA"). Actions against elected officials appear to be particularly vulnerable to this anti-SLAPP provision. Recently, a number of claims brought against politicians have been dismissed under this provision. However, politicians are not necessarily only defendants in actions involving an expression on a matter of public interest. They can also be plaintiffs.

As shown in Cilevitz v. Bergman, 2022 ONSC 4478 (not yet on CanLII), the fact that a politician is a plaintiff does not make them any less vulnerable to a successful motion under section 137.1.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from