Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2026

Recent Decisions Illustrate The Consequences Of Deficient Or Absent Motion Materials

Recent Ontario Superior Court decisions demonstrate how procedural missteps in civil litigation can derail even straightforward motions. From improperly served materials and excessive hearsay to missing factums and deficient affidavits, these cases reveal the tangible consequences when litigants fail to comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Courts are increasingly willing to adjourn, dismiss, or deny relief when parties cannot meet basic evidentiary and procedural requirements.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In litigation, both the substance and the form of court materials matter. The Rules of Civil Procedure govern the conduct of civil claims in Ontario and set out, among other things, the requirements relating to the form, content, and manner in which court materials are prepared and filed. Complemented by the applicable practice directions, these requirements ensure that the evidence and law relied on by parties provide the necessary foundation for the relief sought.

Several recent decisions of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice illustrate that non-compliance with these requirements have consequences, spanning from adjournments to the denial of relief sought.

In Maestra v. Blue Line Distribution Limited et al., 2026 ONSC 4784, the plaintiff commenced a wrongful dismissal action and moved for default judgment after obtaining an order to strike the defendants’ statement of defence. The motion was ultimately adjourned due to several procedural issues.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from