Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2016

Ontario Court Decision Highlights Summary Judgment As Potential Tool In Class Proceedings

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In a recent class action decision, Wise v. Abbott Laboratories Limited, Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment in advance of certification...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent class action decision, Wise v. Abbott Laboratories Limited (Wise), Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment in advance of certification, concluding that there was no genuine issue requiring a trial because there was insufficient evidence of general causation. The decision highlights the potential for defendants to use of summary judgment to resolve a class action before certification in appropriate cases.

BACKGROUND

Abbott Laboratories (Abbott) is the manufacturer of a topical ointment known as AndroGel®, a testosterone replacement therapy for the treatment of hypogonadism (testosterone deficiency) in men.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from