Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2015

Defendants Continue To Have Success With The Pleadings And Identifiable Class Requirements

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this set of cases, individual representative plaintiffs had purchased tickets for international air travel from each of five different defendant airlines.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The trend showing a more rigorous application of the certification criteria in B.C., particularly in respect of the pleadings and identifiable class requirement, has continued with the B.C.S.C.'s reasons for judgment in Unlu v. Air Canada, 2015 BCSC 1453.

In this set of cases, individual representative plaintiffs had purchased tickets for international air travel from each of five different defendant airlines. The tickets included amounts described as airfare as well as variously described taxes and fees, which included amounts for fuel surcharges. The five actions alleged that the manner in which fuel surcharges are displayed and described on passengers' ticket receipts amounts to a deceptive act or practice contrary to the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (the "BPA").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from