Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2018

Considerations On Costs: Boal V. International Capital Management Inc.

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In Boal v. International Capital Management Inc., the representative plaintiff had brought a proposed class action on behalf of 170 investors holding unsecured promissory notes.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Boal v. International Capital Management Inc., the representative plaintiff had brought a proposed class action on behalf of 170 investors holding unsecured promissory notes. 

During the course of litigation, the representative plaintiff had obtained a Norwich Order, a Mareva injunction, and a certificate of pending litigation over a property.

One year later, three of the co-defendants moved for an order discharging the certificate of pending litigation, made a claim for damages, and claimed cost's nearing $75,000.

The discharge was granted but the issue of damages, if any, from the registration of the certificate of pending litigation was deferred to trial.  Further, costs were not initially considered. Instead, Justice Perell left it up to the parties to settle. When the parties failed to do so, written submissions were made.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from