Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2016

Association Alone Does Not Equal Causation In Product Liability Cases

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Class Action Case Update: Justice Perell's recent decision in Wise v Abbott Laboratories, Limited, 2016 ONSC 7275 addressed a number of key areas of interest for the class action bar.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Class Action Case Update: Justice Perell's recent decision in Wise v Abbott Laboratories, Limited, 2016 ONSC 7275 addressed a number of key areas of interest for the class action bar. Full series updates can be found below. 

It seems simple enough: The plaintiff in a negligence case has the onus to prove that the defendant's misconduct has the capacity to cause the alleged damage. However, Justice Perell's recent decision in Wise v Abbott Laboratories, Limited, 2016 ONSC 7275 reminds us that as simple as the onus to prove general causation may seem, without properly proving it, the plaintiff's claim will fail. Importantly–association does not equal causation.

Factual Background

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from