Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MARCH 2026

Absolute Privilege Stops Lawsuits Based On Use Of Intimate Video At A Case Conference (Burns v. Osuji)

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

In the law of defamation, absolute privilege is a complete defence. However, the doctrine of absolute privilege extends beyond defamation law to prevent other causes of action that arise out of ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the law of defamation, absolute privilege is a complete defence. However, the doctrine of absolute privilege extends beyond defamation law to prevent other causes of action that arise out of "anything said or done by anybody in the course of judicial proceedings whatever the nature of the claim made in respect of such behavior or statement."

In Burns v. Osuji, 2026 ABKB 108, the defendant lawyers were able to rely on the doctrine of absolute privilege to strike out two separate actions brought against them for playing an intimate video of the plaintiffs at an Early Intervention Case Conference ("EICC").

The plaintiffs were the former husband of the defendant lawyers' client and the husband's girlfriend. The husband and the wife were involved in divorce proceedings, to which the husband's girlfriend was not a party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from