Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2015

A Change Of Pace For Product Liability Class Actions: Certification Denied In Two Recent Cases

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Oft-referred to as "quintessential class actions", the majority of product liability actions that have sought certification as class proceedings in the last 10 years have been granted certification.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Oft-referred to as "quintessential class actions", the majority of product liability actions that have sought certification as class proceedings in the last 10 years have been granted certification. However, two recent decisions denying certification may signal a shift towards greater scrutiny of proposed product liability class actions. Judges have become more willing to refuse certification where it is not clear there is sufficient commonality amongst the class members or that a class proceeding will be the preferable procedure.

In Warner v Smith & Nephew Inc., a recent Alberta certification decision, the product at issue was Smith & Nephew's hip resurfacing system, known as "the Birmingham system". After being implanted with the Birmingham system, the representative plaintiff was found to have toxic levels of metal ions in her blood (the Birmingham system is a metal product) and had to have the device removed. Certification failed on the issues of identifiable

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from