Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2006

Putting A Collar On Clerical Errors

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Pason Systems Corp. v. The Commissioner of Patents and Varco, L.P. is a judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Patents, which had allowed the correction of clerical errors in a patent.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Article by Christopher Delamere , © 2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin in Intellectual Property - Special Patent Issue, September 2006

Pason Systems Corp. v. The Commissioner of Patents and Varco, L.P.

is a judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Patents, which had allowed the correction of "clerical errors" in a patent.

There have been cases where patentees have sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Patents’ refusal to correct clerical errors. Prior to this case, however, there was no precedent for a third party challenge to a decision made by the Commissioner pertaining to the correction of clerical errors in a patent document. This decision may particularly limit the ability of patentees to amend clerical errors in patents when the patents are the subject of ongoing litigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from