Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2018

Promotional Use Is Not Use Of A Trademark

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

According to the Respondent's evidence, Lush Canada operates over 200 stores in North America, including 46 in Canada.

CanadaIntellectual Property

In a recent decision of the Federal Court in Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v. Cosmetic Warriors Limited (2018 FC 63) available here, Justice Manson allowed the appeal of the decision of the Registrar of Trademarks, thus overturning the finding that the Respondent had demonstrated use of the trademark LUSH in association with t-shirts. 

Cosmetic Warriors (the "Respondent") owns the Registration for the Trademark LUSH (the "Mark") in association with "Clothing, namely t-shirts".  The Respondent was required to furnish evidence of use in response to a s.45 non-use cancellation notice issued by the Registrar of Trademarks at the request of the Applicant, Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from