Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2012

Patentable Subject Matter – Clarity Or Prolonged Confusion?

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

It’s back to the "check-out" counter for Amazon.com’s (Amazon) "one-click" patent application.

CanadaIntellectual Property

It's back to the "check-out" counter for Amazon.com's (Amazon) "one-click" patent application.1 The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) sent the application back to the Commissioner of Patents (Commissioner) for expedited re-examination with a direction to consider the issue of patentable subject matter after a purposive construction of the claims.2

In its initial decision, the Commissioner set out a novel test for determining patentable subject matter and stated that business method patents were traditionally considered non-patentable subject matter in Canada. In particular, the test included a determination of the "actual invention" or the inventive concept, and an assessment of whether the "invention" constituted patentable subject matter.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from