Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2010

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Alert (week of 18th October 2010)

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Court dismissed the plaintiff’s motion to amend its Statement of Claim to add a number of allegations relating to unjust enrichment in conjunction with its "Competition Act" claim.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Editors: Chantal Saunders and Beverley Moore

ACTIONS

Garford Pty Ltd. v. Dywidag Systems International

The Court dismissed the plaintiff's motion to amend its Statement of Claim to add a number of allegations relating to unjust enrichment in conjunction with its Competition Act claim.

The Court held that the Competition Act provides a civil remedy whereby a person can be compensated for actual loss or damage. It does not provide a vehicle for the recovery of any enrichment and cannot provide the basis for an equitable remedy. Thus, the plaintiff's proposed claims were beyond the Court's jurisdiction.

Garford Pty Ltd. v. Dywidag Systems International

The Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the part of the plaintiff's claim relating to compensation pursuant to the Competition Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from