Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2024

Industrial Design And Trademarks Go Hand In Hand

BCF Business Law
BCF Business Law
Contributor
BCF Business Law

BCF Business Law

Firm Overview With more than 520 employees, including 270 professionals, BCF Business Law is the...

View firm profile
Explore more from BCF Business Law

Judicial decisions in matters of industrial design infringement are not common.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Judicial decisions in matters of industrial design infringement are not common. The recent Federal Court decision in Crocs Canada Inc v Double Diamond Distribution Ltd, 2022 FC 1443, is worth noting.

A Protection Tool

In this case, Crocs, manufacturer of the famous molded shoe, was asserting its rights in a registered industrial design for its MAMMOTH shoes with fleece lining, against Double Diamond, which marketed shoes of the same style, also comprising a fleece lining.

The Court, relying in part on expert testimony, concluded, on one hand that Crocs' industrial design was original and not dictated solely by utilitarian functions and therefore valid, on the other hand, that Double Diamond was infringing Crocs' rights by marketing its similar products. The Court ordered Double Diamond to pay Crocs all the profits made on shoes sold in violation of Crocs' rights during the relevant period.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from